

If you still want to test Bitwarden Unified, you can do so with the following setup: Bitwarden Unified docker-compose.yml Calling the web interface in the browserĬurrently, the Unified variant of Bitwarden is still in beta and thus not suitable for production use.Alternative to Bitwarden: compatible version, Vaultwarden: docker-compose.yml.


Sharing: Unlimited Organizations (Bitwarden’s feature for password sharing) Option 2: Self Host Bitwarden Family Plan There is a way, but it’s different.Įase of Use: Bitwarden Client software requires manual configuration Sharing: No Password Sharing like you’re used to. Management: Service availability, backup and recovery is MY responsibility Hacking Exposure: Lowest risk of exposure to hackers Maybe it will be helpful to folks on here: In an effort to discuss/decide on moving my family over to Bitwarden, I created this list of pros/cons for them. I think the db takes a while to initialize, and those healthchecks fail fast and make the whole thing crap the bed. UPDATE: After a bunch of banging my head against a wall, I got it working with the official documentation: įWIW, I think the healthchecks in the originally linked tutorial are actually the culprits. Has anyone been able to get this running? The stack never starts successfully, with the bitwarden-db.err log file reporting: Access denied for user (using password: YES) I've been trying all day to follow this guide:
